bi-directional corridor

weak alignment

regime I

Sustained percolation, optimal queuing. Here \(L_s = 0.1875\) is above the theoretical \(\gamma_\infty\) and shows a large sustained percolation from the beginning, we\'re in the optimal queuing region (lowest \(Q\) values)

regime II

Eventual substained percolation after turbulent transient, excellent queuing. Very similar to regime I in the long term with the difference that \(L_s = 0.175\) being slightly smaller (larger influx) forces a turbulent transient before a long lasting equilibrium with great queuing is established.

regime III

Here \(L_s = 0.1687\) is found between \(\gamma_{1500}\) and \(\gamma_\infty\), meaning that a full occlusion eventually settles sometime after \(t_{\mathrm{max}} = 1500\). Nonetheless, for \(t \le t_{\mathrm{max}}\) we see an interesting mixture of percolation, queuing and turbulence.

regime IV

Rapid onset of full occlusion. \(L_s \ll \gamma_{1500}\) produces a trivial regime where full occlusion settles in very fast and no interesting formations emerge.

strong alignment

regime V

Two-phase flow. Each subgroup flows on respective sides of the corridor creating almost no percolation and an interface between them along the length of the hallway.

regime VI

Counterflow split in two. With \(\nu = 2\), one subgroup overcomes and manages to split the flow of the other in two; thus creating two interfaces along the length of the corridor.

regime VII

Vorticity dominant. With \(\nu = 5\), vorticity completely dominates. This is visually more resemblant to the growing and collapsing of mills for point targets than to an ordered flow.